Kitchen Ihumphrey 2025 11 Cal.5th 135

Kitchen Ihumphrey 2025 11 Cal.5th 135. In humphrey, we held that it is unconstitutional to detain defendants before trial solely because they lack the financial resources to make bail and that accordingly, “courts must consider an. 7), but it later teed up the issue by.

A motion to increase bail was also filed, and the court set the new bail amount at $1 million, rejecting defense counsel’s request for a hearing as to yedinak’s ability to pay or the. In its landmark in re humphrey (2021) 11 cal.5th 135 decision (see here), the court declined to address the first issue (id.